Date   

Re: New Zurich trams finally ordered

Martin Baumann
 

4002 entered service today (line 11)


Expansion in Basel

Toma Bacic
 

BAV approved expansion in Basel:
https://www.bav.admin.ch/bav/de/home/publikationen/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-80969.html
Where exactly the new 4-track section will start ('...vom nördlichen Rheinufer in Basel.).

Thank you and regards
toma

--
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Zagreb


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net)

csipromo
 

I already did. It has not yet been posted into the comment section as of a few days ago.

Regards

Mike C


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net) 11630 and 11629

csipromo
 

Here are the photos that I had managed to find:

http://home.datacomm.ch/eisenbahn.info/re66/rebild09a.jpg
http://home.datacomm.ch/eisenbahn.info/re66/rebild10a.jpg
As well as this report, which also includes a report on the later collision in Osogna (1986):
http://home.datacomm.ch/eisenbahn.info/re66/ungluecksfaelle.pdf

Regards

Mike C


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net) 11630 and 11629

Guerbetaler
 

Am 03.11.2020 um 22:50 schrieb Guerbetaler:
The Swiss fire brigade journal published the photo attached on its title
page of the August 1980 issue.
Another photo from that journal shows the other side.

Markus


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net) 11630 and 11629

Guerbetaler
 

The Swiss fire brigade journal published the photo attached on its title page of the August 1980 issue. 11629 rolled against 11630 at the head of an oil train in Muttenz. Obviously 11629 hadn't been duly parked and secured.

Markus


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net)

gordonwis
 

If the chalk marking was 11605 it would be a different matter but '605' means nothing necessarily. So who's going to post the comment in Railpictures...?


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net)

csipromo
 

There is another photo taken the same day which clearly shows 11629 in the shops, so that would suggest that it has to be 11630 in stripped down state in the photo from the original post:
https://www.railpictures.net/photo/752691/

11629 was the locomotive that 11630 collided with as it was pulling an oil train in Basel harbour.

This photo shows a pair of Re 6/6 cab enclosures, of which at least one probably ended up in the rebuilt 11630:
https://www.railpictures.net/photo/752722/

Regards

Mike C


Re: RhB : list of Ge6/6ii passenger diagrams Oct 2020

Mick Sasse
 

... and most assuredly of interest, I would say (well, subject to travel restrictions one day being lifted!).

Thanks for sharing
Mick


Re: RhB : list of Ge6/6ii passenger diagrams Oct 2020

Guerbetaler
 

Am 02.11.2020 um 22:32 schrieb David Prior via groups.io:
in folder RhB. [...] (Apologies if this is not the optimal folder
Perfect place! If anybody has doubts as to where he might upload interesting stuff, don't hesitate to contact the moderators at
<mailto:SwissRail+owner@groups.io>

Markus


RhB : list of Ge6/6ii passenger diagrams Oct 2020

David Prior
 

https://swissrail.groups.io/g/main/files/RhB/RhB%20Ge%206:6ii%20Oct%202020.pdf

File uploaded showing daily Ge 6/6ii passenger diagrams in folder RhB. No guarantees they actually worked. (Apologies if this is not the optimal folder or of no/limited interest - if this info is worthwhile I’m happy to be guided where it best belongs : Nov sheet under compilation).

Shows a clear pattern of which trains are a good bet (4109/1113), and which not (4367).


Re: Photo (Railpictures.net)

Guerbetaler
 

Am 02.11.2020 um 05:29 schrieb csipromo via groups.io:
I thought that with the date of 1981, this could be 11630, but there
are clearly markings that say 605 and 005 on the chassis seen in the
photo. Does anybody have any information as to why a 6 year old
locomotive needed such repairs or could this be the 11630?
I can't imagine anything else than this being 11630. According to EA 10/1980 this locomotive was brought to Bellinzona for repair. It arrived there on 8 Sept 1980. Danuser/Streiff say building a new carbody by SLM had been found too expensive and that SBB repaired the locomotive. All this fits perfectly with the picture in question. 605 and 005 seem to be markings for the workforce and mislead the writer of the caption to think it had a relation to the locomotive number 11605, which was pure speculation. Danuser/Streiff list all heavy repairs but nothing about 11605.

Markus, Gürbetal


Photo (Railpictures.net)

csipromo
 

Jean-Marc Frybourg posted a photo that supposedly shows Re 6/6 11605 with only half of it's superstructure, taken at Bellinzona shops in Summer 1981.
https://www.railpictures.net/photo/752729/

I could only find three locomotives involved in serious accidents around that time, of which only the first, 11630 in 1980, fits that period. The others were 11611 in 1986 and 11638 in 1990. I thought that with the date of 1981, this could be 11630, but there are clearly markings that say 605 and 005 on the chassis seen in the photo.

Does anybody have any information as to why a 6 year old locomotive needed such repairs or could this be the 11630?

Regards

Mike C


Re: re SBB Cargo locos

Martin Baumann
 

Yes, Cargo, certainly in recent years, have been unwiling to pay for R3 overhauls for any locos except Re 6/6

The only loco of the group to get an R3 was 11375 (as it still was at the time) released 22.05.2002


Re: re SBB Cargo locos

csipromo
 

I did not know that. Thanks for the information
Was this a result of the division of the fleet between SBB and SBB Cargo?

Regards

Mike C


Re: SBB Cargo locos

csipromo
 

I forgot about that one. The models I had were 397 (Ma37345), 387 (Ro78405), 374 (Ma29483).
Maybe I can still find a Roco 79257 (389) somewhere?

MC


Re: SBB Cargo locos

Chris Lee
 

On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 14:24:01 -0700
"csipromo via groups.io" <csipromo=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

There goes another one of my Maerklin models that can no longer be prototypically used for it's original purpose...
That was the one that was pulling my SBB EC Bavaria. I guess that it was going to be replaced when the new special livery Re 421 came out.
I guess I will retrograde 374 to pulling the EC in the original livery.
Is it co-incident or was it purposely that SBB Cargo sells off those
individual locomotives that had been made models? I have the Roco 72405
(421 387 2) which was sold earlier and now in cream and badge TEE color
which is in the same situation as Mike mentioned.

They must have cooperate with the model makers so modellers will now have
to buy another 2 new locomotives (one in the new livery and another one
in Cargo ^_^

--
Photographer Chris <photographer.chris@gmail.com>


re SBB Cargo locos

Martin Baumann
 


The 421s with one exception have never had a full (R3) overhaul so are in not as great a conditon as some of the older locos


Re: SBB Cargo locos (421 374)

csipromo
 

I wonder if it will get a distinctive yellow livery like the 487 did? If not, it would be nice to see it in classic green.

Regards

Mike C


Re: SBB Cargo locos

csipromo
 

There goes another one of my Maerklin models that can no longer be prototypically used for it's original purpose...

That was the one that was pulling my SBB EC Bavaria. I guess that it was going to be replaced when the new special livery Re 421 came out.
I guess I will retrograde 374 to pulling the EC in the original livery.

Back to the real thing...
It would seem to me that the 421s being the most recent of the series delivered, that they would be in better shape than some of the older ones dating back to 1969.

Regards

Mike C

701 - 720 of 28790